On Tuesday and Wednesday, HT visited Patanjali stores across four major Indian cities New Delhi. Lucknow Patna and Dehradun and was able to procure most of these products, procuring a receipt in each of these cases. In some shops, while not all of the 14 products were available, these have put down. To a lack of availability, with people manning the counters insisting these could be procure within a week. To be sure, each of the 14 products found in one store or the other. 14 barred Patanjali products

Read More:-NMC’s Vigilance: Combatting the Surge of Fake Notices

Tuesday’s order by the apex court led by justice Hima Kohli was pass despite a later affidavit. The Uttarakhand government informing the court that the ban impose on April 15 was revoke. By another state department on procedural grounds, following which fresh show cause notices issued to Patanjali on July 8. But Patanjali’s laywer said that the company had not yet received an official communication regarding the revocation of the ban, and as such. The company remains bound by the Supreme Court’s orders. “The respondent 5 (Patanjali Ayurved Limited) shall state on affidavit whether the request to intermediaries has aced to and whether. The 14 Ayurvedic formulations have withdrawn,” stated the court in its order on Tuesday.

However, a Bench of Justices Hima Kohli and Sandeep Mehta directed Patanjali to file an affidavit in two weeks, stating whether or not the social media intermediaries have actually withdrawn the advertisements on Patanjali’s request. 14 barred Patanjali products

Meanwhile, the court clarify that its May 7 order, directing advertisers to submit self-declarations that they are not misrepresenting or making false claims about products, especially in the health and food sectors. Before promoting them in the electronic, print, or online media was not meant to harass the advertising industry.

Yoga guru Baba Ramdev’s Patanjali Ayurveda Ltd said on Tuesday that it had stopped the sale of 14 products after Uttarakhand suspended its manufacturing licenses with immediate effect. It informed the Supreme Court that it had instructed 5,606 franchise stores to withdraw these products.

The court told the company to file an affidavit in two weeks confirming. That advertisements for its ban medicines have removed from media platforms. It stressed that the advertisement industry should not suffer due to its earlier directions telling advertisers. To file self-declaration forms on the nature of ads.
The court had in May told broadcasters to file the self-declaration on the Broadcast Seva portal run by the Information and Broadcasting Ministry (I&B Ministry). It ordered the central government to set up a new portal for filing such self-declaration forms for advertisements in print media. Television, radio, and internet associations then filed applications to intervene. In the proceedings, saying the court’s directions would affect the advertising industry.
The court on Tuesday told the Centre to meet with stakeholders and senior I&B Ministry officials to resolve issues faced by advertisers. It also said that the Ministry of Consumer Affairs should be made a party.

“We are also of the opinion that the industry (advertisement industry) should not suffer in any manner. The focus of this court has already been highlight in previous orders and needs no repetition. The Ministry is directed to continue the churning of ideas and have further meetings. In this direction and file an affidavit making its recommendations,” said the bench.14 barred Patanjali products

IMA chief apologises

The Indian Medical Association (IMA) said its president, Dr R V Asokan, has apologised for his remarks. Which made in an interview, about the court’s observations in the Patanjali case. The association said that Asokan has published the apology on the IMA’s website and in its monthly journal.
The court is hearing a petition filed by the IMA against Patanjali advertisements that attacked allopathy and made claims about curing certain diseases. It has reserved an order in the misleading advertisements case.
The Uttarakhand State Licensing Authority had earlier told. The court that it had suspended the manufacturing licences of 14 products of Patanjali Ayurved.